SEEM vs VTI
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SEEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SEEM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $604M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 249 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.00% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.97% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
SEEM vs VTI Performance
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) is a ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SEEM returned +40.97% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, SEEM is up 21.00% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SEEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.0% for SEEM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SEEM charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SEEM currently yields 2.52% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SEEM and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3017 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SEEM or VTI?
SEEM has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SEEM or VTI?
Over the past year SEEM returned +40.97% vs +23.62% for VTI, so SEEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SEEM annualized +30.46% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SEEM or VTI?
SEEM has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SEEM -14.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SEEM and VTI?
SEEM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SEEM and VTI?
SEEM and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3017 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SEEM or VTI?
SEEM yields 2.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SEEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.