SIXH vs ZAP
ETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity Index Option ETF vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Which is better, SIXH or ZAP?
Each has led over a different period.
ZAP has a lower expense ratio. SIXH led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SIXH | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $621M | $428M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 1.87% |
| Holdings | 107 | 94 |
| YTD Return | +18.91%Best | +9.35% |
| 1Y Return | +21.03%Best | +6.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.84% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.60% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8%Best | 14.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.1%Best | -13.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,113 | $13,757Best |
| Fund Family | 6 Meridian ETF | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 11, 2020 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.9 years).
SIXH vs ZAP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
SIXH vs ZAP Performance
ETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity Index Option ETF (SIXH) is an ETF from 6 Meridian ETF and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year SIXH returned +21.03% while ZAP returned +6.47%. Year to date, SIXH is up 18.91% versus a gain of 9.35% for ZAP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 7.8% for SIXH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.1% for SIXH and -13.0% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.12. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SIXH charges 0.69% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $50 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SIXH currently yields 1.74% against 1.87% for ZAP.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SIXH and ZAP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SIXH or ZAP?
SIXH has an expense ratio of 0.69% while ZAP charges 0.50%. ZAP is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SIXH or ZAP?
Over the past year SIXH returned +21.03% vs +6.47% for ZAP, so SIXH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SIXH annualized +15.33% vs +18.28% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SIXH or ZAP?
ZAP has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 7.8% for SIXH. Worst drawdown: SIXH -9.1% vs ZAP -13.0%.
Should I hold both SIXH and ZAP?
SIXH and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.12, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SIXH or ZAP?
SIXH yields 1.74% while ZAP yields 1.87%, so ZAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZAP better than SIXH?
ZAP has a lower expense ratio. SIXH led over 1Y, ZAP over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.