SLQD vs VTI
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SLQD or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLQD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.37% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 3,087 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +0.52% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.57% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.40% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.52% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.3%Best | 14.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.7%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,325 | $18,286Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 17, 2013 to Oct 2, 2026 (13 years).
SLQD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SLQD vs VTI Performance
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLQD returned +1.57% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, SLQD is up 0.52% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, SLQD compounded at +5.40% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.52% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.36% annualized vs +1.31%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 2.3% for SLQD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.7% for SLQD and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLQD charges 0.06% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLQD currently yields 4.37% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings SLQD also owns.
Stated as a floor: for SLQD, our book for it covers 85.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
3 positions in common, counted across the 2,607 positions we hold weights for in SLQD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 3,087 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SLQD and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLQD or VTI?
SLQD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLQD or VTI?
Over the past year SLQD returned +1.57% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), SLQD annualized +1.31% vs +12.36% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SLQD or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 2.3% for SLQD. Worst drawdown: SLQD -12.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both SLQD and VTI?
SLQD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLQD or VTI?
SLQD yields 4.37% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SLQD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SLQD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.