SLQD vs VTI
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLQD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.4B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.34% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 3,046 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.46% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.44% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.66% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.72% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
SLQD vs VTI Performance
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLQD returned +3.44% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, SLQD is up 1.46% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, SLQD compounded at +5.66% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.72% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 2.3% for SLQD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.7% for SLQD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLQD charges 0.06% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLQD currently yields 4.34% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SLQD and VTI share 3 holdings out of 5481 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLQD or VTI?
SLQD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SLQD or VTI?
Over the past year SLQD returned +3.44% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), SLQD annualized +1.39% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SLQD or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 2.3% for SLQD. Worst drawdown: SLQD -12.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SLQD and VTI?
SLQD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SLQD and VTI?
SLQD and VTI share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 5481 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLQD or VTI?
SLQD yields 4.34% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SLQD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.