SPDW vs VOE
State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF vs Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
Quick Verdict
SPDW has a lower expense ratio. SPDW delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPDW offers more diversification with 2348 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPDW | VOE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $40.0B | $22.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.02% | 2.31% | |
| Holdings | 2,440 | 177 | |
| YTD Return | +17.66% | +18.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.00% | +25.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.29% | +17.05% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.83% | +10.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 17.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.2% | -63.4% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2007 | Aug 17, 2006 |
SPDW vs VOE Performance
State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF (SPDW) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPDW returned +29.00% while VOE returned +25.06%. Year to date, SPDW is up 17.66% versus a gain of 18.67% for VOE.
Over three years, SPDW compounded at +20.29% per year against +17.05% for VOE; over five years the annualized figures are +9.83% and +10.16% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VOE has the edge at +8.02% annualized vs +3.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPDW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 17.6% for VOE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.2% for SPDW and -63.4% for VOE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPDW charges 0.03% per year while VOE charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPDW currently yields 3.02% against 2.31% for VOE.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPDW or VOE?
SPDW has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VOE charges 0.05%. SPDW is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPDW or VOE?
Over the past year SPDW returned +29.00% vs +25.06% for VOE, so SPDW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), SPDW annualized +3.21% vs +8.02% for VOE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPDW or VOE?
SPDW has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 17.6% for VOE. Worst drawdown: SPDW -62.2% vs VOE -63.4%.
Should I hold both SPDW and VOE?
SPDW and VOE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SPDW and VOE?
SPDW and VOE share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPDW or VOE?
SPDW yields 3.02% while VOE yields 2.31%, so SPDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.