SPY vs SRET
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPY | SRET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.58% | |
| AUM | $821.1B | $230M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 7.87% | |
| Holdings | 505 | 34 | |
| YTD Return | +13.17% | +7.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.53% | +14.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.06% | +11.91% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.35% | +3.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 22.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -67.7% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 1993 | Mar 16, 2015 |
SPY vs SRET Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year SPY returned +21.53% while SRET returned +14.02%. Year to date, SPY is up 13.17% versus a gain of 7.27% for SRET.
Over three years, SPY compounded at +22.06% per year against +11.91% for SRET; over five years the annualized figures are +13.35% and +3.20% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.82% annualized vs -2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for SPY and -67.7% for SRET. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPY charges 0.09% per year while SRET charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $58 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 1.01% against 7.87% for SRET.
Holdings Overlap
SPY and SRET share 1 holdings out of 526 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SPY | Weight in SRET | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VICI | 0.04% | 3.13% | 3.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPY or SRET?
SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while SRET charges 0.58%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPY or SRET?
Over the past year SPY returned +21.53% vs +14.02% for SRET, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), SPY annualized +8.82% vs -2.37% for SRET. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPY or SRET?
SRET has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: SPY -56.5% vs SRET -67.7%.
Should I hold both SPY and SRET?
SPY and SRET have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SPY and SRET?
SPY and SRET share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or SRET?
SPY yields 1.01% while SRET yields 7.87%, so SRET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.