SPY vs XMVM
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
Which is better, SPY or XMVM?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Value.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, XMVM over 1Y. XMVM is less concentrated, with 22.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPY | XMVM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09%Best | 0.37% |
| AUM | $811.2B | $496M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 1.79% |
| Holdings | 1,515 | 162 |
| YTD Return | +13.54%Best | +12.26% |
| 1Y Return | +16.25% | +18.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.72%Best | +19.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.95%Best | +11.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9%Best | 19.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -63.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,212Best | $17,226 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.2% | 22.8%Best |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 22, 1993 | Mar 3, 2005 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 3, 2005 to Oct 2, 2026 (21.6 years).
SPY vs XMVM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.6 years both funds cover.
SPY vs XMVM Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year SPY returned +16.25% while XMVM returned +18.48%. Year to date, SPY is up 13.54% versus a gain of 12.26% for XMVM.
Over three years, SPY compounded at +23.72% per year against +19.50% for XMVM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.95% and +11.49% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +9.33% annualized vs +7.95%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XMVM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 14.9% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for SPY and -63.8% for XMVM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPY charges 0.09% per year while XMVM charges 0.37%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $37 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 0.98% against 1.79% for XMVM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 504 holdings in SPY and 79 in XMVM, totalling 99.8% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 79 in XMVM, against full books of 1,515 and 162.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 79 positions for XMVM that do not appear in our book for SPY (100.0% of the fund), and 497 for SPY that do not appear in XMVM (99.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SPY and XMVM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPY or XMVM?
SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while XMVM charges 0.37%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SPY or XMVM?
Over the past year SPY returned +16.25% vs +18.48% for XMVM, so XMVM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), SPY annualized +9.33% vs +7.95% for XMVM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SPY or XMVM?
XMVM has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 14.9% for SPY. Worst drawdown: SPY -56.5% vs XMVM -63.8%.
Should I hold both SPY and XMVM?
SPY and XMVM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or XMVM?
SPY yields 0.98% while XMVM yields 1.79%, so XMVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XMVM better than SPY?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, XMVM over 1Y. XMVM is less concentrated, with 22.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.