SPY vs ZFEB

SPY vs ZFEB

Which is better, SPY or ZFEB?

Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSPYZFEB
Expense Ratio0.09%Best0.79%
AUM$804.7B$152M
Dividend Yield0.98%0.00%
Holdings50510
YTD Return+12.09%Best+3.65%
1Y Return+16.29%Best+5.73%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.20%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.37%-
Volatility (annualized)13.1%2.3%Best
Max Drawdown-18.8%-3.0%Best
$10,000 over 1.6 years$12,917Best$10,990
Fund FamilyState Street Investment ManagementInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendOption Writing
InceptionJan 22, 1993Jan 31, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 3, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.6 years).

SPY vs ZFEB growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.

SPY vs ZFEB Performance

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year SPY returned +16.29% while ZFEB returned +5.73%. Year to date, SPY is up 12.09% versus a gain of 3.65% for ZFEB.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 2.3% for ZFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for SPY and -3.0% for ZFEB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SPY charges 0.09% per year while ZFEB charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $79 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 0.98% against 0.00% for ZFEB.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SPY and ZFEB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SPYZFEB

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SPY or ZFEB?

SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while ZFEB charges 0.79%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SPY or ZFEB?

Over the past year SPY returned +16.29% vs +5.73% for ZFEB, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SPY annualized +17.35% vs +6.08% for ZFEB. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SPY or ZFEB?

SPY has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 2.3% for ZFEB. Worst drawdown: SPY -18.8% vs ZFEB -3.0%.

Should I hold both SPY and ZFEB?

SPY and ZFEB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or ZFEB?

SPY yields 0.98% while ZFEB yields 0.00%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZFEB better than SPY?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.