TECS vs VTI
Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TECS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $77M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 89.69% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -64.48% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | -73.89% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -64.18% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -56.54% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 51.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
TECS vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X ETF (TECS) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TECS returned -73.89% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, TECS is down 64.48% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, TECS compounded at -64.18% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -56.54% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -57.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TECS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 51.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for TECS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.81. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TECS charges 1.01% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $3 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TECS currently yields 89.69% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TECS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TECS or VTI?
TECS has an expense ratio of 1.01% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $98 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TECS or VTI?
Over the past year TECS returned -73.89% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), TECS annualized -57.94% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TECS or VTI?
TECS has been the more volatile fund at 51.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TECS -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TECS and VTI?
TECS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TECS and VTI?
TECS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TECS or VTI?
TECS yields 89.69% while VTI yields 1.07%, so TECS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.