TFLO vs USFR
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF vs WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
Quick Verdict
USFR delivered stronger 1-year returns. TFLO offers more diversification with 4 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TFLO | USFR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $6.6B | $18.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.89% | 3.84% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +1.98% | +2.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.60% | +3.95% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.53% | +4.52% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.72% | +3.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.7% | 0.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.0% | -1.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Feb 4, 2014 | Feb 4, 2014 |
TFLO vs USFR Performance
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year TFLO returned +3.60% while USFR returned +3.95%. Year to date, TFLO is up 1.98% versus a gain of 2.33% for USFR.
Over three years, TFLO compounded at +4.53% per year against +4.52% for USFR; over five years the annualized figures are +3.72% and +3.72% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, TFLO has the edge at +1.50% annualized vs +1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 0.9% compared with 0.7% for TFLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.0% for TFLO and -1.4% for USFR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TFLO charges 0.15% per year while USFR charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $15 annually. On income, TFLO currently yields 3.89% against 3.84% for USFR.
Holdings Overlap
TFLO and USFR share 0 holdings out of 5 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TFLO or USFR?
TFLO has an expense ratio of 0.15% while USFR charges 0.15%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TFLO or USFR?
Over the past year TFLO returned +3.60% vs +3.95% for USFR, so USFR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), TFLO annualized +1.50% vs +1.49% for USFR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TFLO or USFR?
USFR has been the more volatile fund at 0.9% annualized versus 0.7% for TFLO. Worst drawdown: TFLO -5.0% vs USFR -1.4%.
Should I hold both TFLO and USFR?
TFLO and USFR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TFLO and USFR?
TFLO and USFR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 5 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TFLO or USFR?
TFLO yields 3.89% while USFR yields 3.84%, so TFLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.