TMET vs VTI
iShares Transition-Enabling Metals ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TMET delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TMET | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $13M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 12.93% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 20 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.70% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +63.60% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
TMET vs VTI Performance
iShares Transition-Enabling Metals ETF (TMET) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TMET returned +63.60% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, TMET is up 12.70% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for TMET and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.12. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TMET charges 0.48% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMET currently yields 12.93% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TMET and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TMET or VTI?
TMET has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TMET or VTI?
Over the past year TMET returned +63.60% vs +22.35% for VTI, so TMET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), TMET annualized +40.68% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TMET or VTI?
TMET has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TMET -22.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TMET and VTI?
TMET and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.12, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TMET and VTI?
TMET and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TMET or VTI?
TMET yields 12.93% while VTI yields 1.07%, so TMET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.