UBEW vs VTI
Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, UBEW or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UBEW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 43.86% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -29.95% | +11.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | -41.24% | +17.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.72% |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
UBEW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
UBEW vs VTI Performance
Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UBEW returned -41.24% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, UBEW is down 29.95% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UBEW charges 0.99% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UBEW currently yields 43.86% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in UBEW and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 26.3% and 90.6% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in UBEW and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 5 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in UBEW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 19.98% | 0.20% | 19.78% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of UBEW and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UBEW or VTI?
UBEW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, UBEW or VTI?
Over the past year UBEW returned -41.24% vs +17.34% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, UBEW or VTI?
UBEW yields 43.86% while VTI yields 1.03%, so UBEW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than UBEW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.