UEVM vs VTI
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UEVM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $249M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.60% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 204 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.31% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.79% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.30% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.60% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
UEVM vs VTI Performance
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UEVM returned +13.79% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, UEVM is up 7.31% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, UEVM compounded at +17.30% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.60% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UEVM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.1% for UEVM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UEVM charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UEVM currently yields 3.60% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UEVM or VTI?
UEVM has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UEVM or VTI?
Over the past year UEVM returned +13.79% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), UEVM annualized +4.89% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UEVM or VTI?
UEVM has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UEVM -48.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both UEVM and VTI?
UEVM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UEVM and VTI?
UEVM and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2974 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UEVM or VTI?
UEVM yields 3.60% while VTI yields 1.07%, so UEVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.