UFEB vs VTI
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UFEB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $238M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.87% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.19% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.98% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.34% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
UFEB vs VTI Performance
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UFEB returned +12.19% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, UFEB is up 6.87% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, UFEB compounded at +11.98% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.34% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 6.6% for UFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for UFEB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UFEB charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UFEB currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UFEB or VTI?
UFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UFEB or VTI?
Over the past year UFEB returned +12.19% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), UFEB annualized +7.44% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UFEB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 6.6% for UFEB. Worst drawdown: UFEB -13.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both UFEB and VTI?
UFEB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, UFEB or VTI?
UFEB yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.