UXRP vs VTI
ProShares Ultra XRP ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, UXRP or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UXRP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.67% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $47M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -71.39% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | -91.03% | +17.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 93.0% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -96.9% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $722 | $12,535Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 15, 2025 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.2 years).
UXRP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
UXRP vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UXRP returned -91.03% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, UXRP is down 71.39% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UXRP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 93.0% compared with 12.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.9% for UXRP and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UXRP charges 1.67% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $167 vs $3 annually, a gap of $164 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UXRP currently yields 0.01% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of UXRP and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UXRP or VTI?
UXRP has an expense ratio of 1.67% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $164 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, UXRP or VTI?
Over the past year UXRP returned -91.03% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), UXRP annualized -88.81% vs +20.72% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, UXRP or VTI?
UXRP has been the more volatile fund at 93.0% annualized versus 12.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UXRP -96.9% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both UXRP and VTI?
UXRP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, UXRP or VTI?
UXRP yields 0.01% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than UXRP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.