VEXC vs VYM
Vanguard Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, VEXC or VYM?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VEXC led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VEXC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $258M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 1,050 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +22.64%Best | +13.75% |
| 1Y Return | +30.38%Best | +19.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.17% |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.2% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
VEXC vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VEXC vs VYM Performance
Vanguard Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (VEXC) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VEXC returned +30.38% while VYM returned +19.42%. Year to date, VEXC is up 22.64% versus a gain of 13.75% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VEXC charges 0.07% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $4 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VEXC currently yields 1.41% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of VEXC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings VEXC also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 1,000 positions we hold weights for in VEXC and 603 in VYM, against full books of 1,050 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 568 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for VEXC (97.5% of the fund), and 19 for VEXC that do not appear in VYM (2.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VEXC | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAL:MBHindustan Aeronautics Ltd | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VEXC and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VEXC or VYM?
VEXC has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VEXC or VYM?
Over the past year VEXC returned +30.38% vs +19.42% for VYM, so VEXC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, VEXC or VYM?
VEXC yields 1.41% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than VEXC?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VEXC led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.