VGIT vs VONG
VGIT vs VONG
Vanguard Intermediate Term Treasury ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
VGIT has a lower expense ratio. VONG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VONG offers more diversification with 386 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VGIT | VONG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $42.1B | $44.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.84% | 0.54% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 390 | |
| YTD Return | -0.62% | +5.90% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.32% | +13.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.60% | +22.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.12% | +12.77% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.3% | 15.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2% | -32.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2009 | Sep 20, 2010 |
VGIT vs VONG Performance
Vanguard Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VGIT returned +1.32% while VONG returned +13.27%. Year to date, VGIT is down 0.62% versus a gain of 5.90% for VONG.
Over three years, VGIT compounded at +3.60% per year against +22.41% for VONG; over five years the annualized figures are -0.12% and +12.77% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VONG has the edge at +15.80% annualized vs +0.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VONG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 4.3% for VGIT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for VGIT and -32.7% for VONG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.07. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VGIT charges 0.03% per year while VONG charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VGIT currently yields 3.84% against 0.54% for VONG.
Holdings Overlap
VGIT and VONG share 0 holdings out of 470 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VGIT or VONG?
VGIT has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VONG charges 0.06%. VGIT is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VGIT or VONG?
Over the past year VGIT returned +1.32% vs +13.27% for VONG, so VONG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VGIT annualized +0.75% vs +15.80% for VONG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VGIT or VONG?
VONG has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 4.3% for VGIT. Worst drawdown: VGIT -17.2% vs VONG -32.7%.
Should I hold both VGIT and VONG?
VGIT and VONG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.07, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VGIT and VONG?
VGIT and VONG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 470 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VGIT or VONG?
VGIT yields 3.84% while VONG yields 0.54%, so VGIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.