VGIT vs VTIP

VGIT vs VTIP

Which is better, VGIT or VTIP?

VTIP has been ahead.

VTIP led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: VTIP

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVGITVTIP
Expense Ratio0.03%Tie0.03%Tie
AUM$50.8B$19.8B
Dividend Yield3.90%4.16%
Holdings10625
YTD Return-1.68%+1.32%Best
1Y Return-0.98%+1.48%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+3.67%+5.14%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-0.30%+3.15%Best
Volatility (annualized)4.2%2.4%Best
Max Drawdown-17.2%-7.1%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$9,851$11,677Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
InceptionNov 19, 2009Oct 12, 2012

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight, Style.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 16, 2012 to Sep 17, 2026 (13.9 years).

VGIT vs VTIP growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.9 years both funds cover.

Compare VGIT against instead:VGIT vs SPYVGIT vs QQQVGIT vs VOOVGIT vs VTIVTIP against:VTIP vs VXUS

VGIT vs VTIP Performance

Vanguard Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VGIT returned -0.98% while VTIP returned +1.48%. Year to date, VGIT is down 1.68% versus a gain of 1.32% for VTIP.

Over three years, VGIT compounded at +3.67% per year against +5.14% for VTIP; over five years the annualized figures are -0.30% and +3.15% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTIP has the edge at +1.53% annualized vs +0.12%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VGIT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4.2% compared with 2.4% for VTIP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for VGIT and -7.1% for VTIP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VGIT charges 0.03% per year while VTIP charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, VGIT currently yields 3.90% against 4.16% for VTIP.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VGIT and VTIP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VGITVTIP

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VGIT or VTIP?

VGIT has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTIP charges 0.03%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, VGIT or VTIP?

Over the past year VGIT returned -0.98% vs +1.48% for VTIP, so VTIP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), VGIT annualized +0.12% vs +1.53% for VTIP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VGIT or VTIP?

VGIT has been the more volatile fund at 4.2% annualized versus 2.4% for VTIP. Worst drawdown: VGIT -17.2% vs VTIP -7.1%.

Should I hold both VGIT and VTIP?

VGIT and VTIP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, VGIT or VTIP?

VGIT yields 3.90% while VTIP yields 4.16%, so VTIP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTIP better than VGIT?

VTIP led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.