VGIT vs VV

VGIT vs VV
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

VV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VV offers more diversification with 437 holdings.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: VVMore Diversified: VV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVGITVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.03%
AUM$42.4B$52.6B
Dividend Yield3.88%1.03%
Holdings209437
YTD Return-0.22%+13.38%
1Y Return+1.22%+20.36%
3Y Return (annualized)+4.11%+22.17%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.07%+12.53%
Volatility (annualized)4.3%14.8%
Max Drawdown-17.2%-56.0%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
InceptionNov 19, 2009Jan 27, 2004

VGIT vs VV Performance

Vanguard Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF (VV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VGIT returned +1.22% while VV returned +20.36%. Year to date, VGIT is down 0.22% versus a gain of 13.38% for VV.

Over three years, VGIT compounded at +4.11% per year against +22.17% for VV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.07% and +12.53% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VV has the edge at +9.49% annualized vs +0.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 4.3% for VGIT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for VGIT and -56.0% for VV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VGIT charges 0.03% per year while VV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, VGIT currently yields 3.88% against 1.03% for VV.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

VGIT and VV share 0 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VGIT or VV?

VGIT has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VV charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.

Which performed better, VGIT or VV?

Over the past year VGIT returned +1.22% vs +20.36% for VV, so VV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), VGIT annualized +0.78% vs +9.49% for VV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, VGIT or VV?

VV has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 4.3% for VGIT. Worst drawdown: VGIT -17.2% vs VV -56.0%.

Should I hold both VGIT and VV?

VGIT and VV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between VGIT and VV?

VGIT and VV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, VGIT or VV?

VGIT yields 3.88% while VV yields 1.03%, so VGIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free