VGIT vs VWO

VGIT vs VWO

Which is better, VGIT or VWO?

VWO has been ahead.

VGIT has a lower expense ratio. VWO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VGITHigher Returns: VWO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVGITVWO
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.06%
AUM$50.8B$122.0B
Dividend Yield3.90%2.29%
Holdings1066,334
YTD Return-1.68%+9.20%Best
1Y Return-0.98%+12.76%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+3.67%+17.47%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-0.30%+6.36%Best
Volatility (annualized)4.3%Best17.2%
Max Drawdown-17.2%Best-43.7%
$10,000 over 5 years$9,851$13,611Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Blend
InceptionNov 19, 2009Mar 4, 2005

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 23, 2009 to Sep 17, 2026 (16.8 years).

VGIT vs VWO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.8 years both funds cover.

VGIT vs VWO Performance

Vanguard Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VGIT returned -0.98% while VWO returned +12.76%. Year to date, VGIT is down 1.68% versus a gain of 9.20% for VWO.

Over three years, VGIT compounded at +3.67% per year against +17.47% for VWO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.30% and +6.36% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VWO has the edge at +3.24% annualized vs +0.68%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VWO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 4.3% for VGIT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for VGIT and -43.7% for VWO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VGIT charges 0.03% per year while VWO charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VGIT currently yields 3.90% against 2.29% for VWO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VGIT and VWO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VGITVWO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VGIT or VWO?

VGIT has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VWO charges 0.06%. VGIT is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VGIT or VWO?

Over the past year VGIT returned -0.98% vs +12.76% for VWO, so VWO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), VGIT annualized +0.68% vs +3.24% for VWO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VGIT or VWO?

VWO has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 4.3% for VGIT. Worst drawdown: VGIT -17.2% vs VWO -43.7%.

Should I hold both VGIT and VWO?

VGIT and VWO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, VGIT or VWO?

VGIT yields 3.90% while VWO yields 2.29%, so VGIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VWO better than VGIT?

VGIT has a lower expense ratio. VWO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.