VMLUX vs VNQ

VMLUX vs VNQ
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

VMLUX has a lower expense ratio. VNQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VMLUX offers more diversification with 7,110 holdings.

Lower Fees: VMLUXHigher Returns: VNQMore Diversified: VMLUX

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVMLUXVNQWinner
Expense Ratio0.09%0.13%
AUM$34.5B$39.3B
Dividend Yield2.93%3.49%
Holdings7,110144
YTD Return-0.64%+13.57%
1Y Return-0.36%+12.92%
3Y Return (annualized)+0.87%+11.70%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.56%+2.31%
Volatility (annualized)2.8%21.4%
Max Drawdown-8.4%-75.8%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryTax PreferredEquity
InceptionFeb 12, 2001Sep 23, 2004

VMLUX vs VNQ Performance

Vanguard Limited Term Tax-Exempt Fund admiral class (VMLUX) is a mutual fund from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VMLUX returned -0.36% while VNQ returned +12.92%. Year to date, VMLUX is down 0.64% versus a gain of 13.57% for VNQ.

Over three years, VMLUX compounded at +0.87% per year against +11.70% for VNQ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.56% and +2.31% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VNQ has the edge at +4.14% annualized vs -0.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VNQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 2.8% for VMLUX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for VMLUX and -75.8% for VNQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VMLUX charges 0.09% per year while VNQ charges 0.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $13 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VMLUX currently yields 2.93% against 3.49% for VNQ.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

VMLUX and VNQ share 0 holdings out of 1059 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VMLUX or VNQ?

VMLUX has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VNQ charges 0.13%. VMLUX is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.

Which performed better, VMLUX or VNQ?

Over the past year VMLUX returned -0.36% vs +12.92% for VNQ, so VNQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VMLUX annualized -0.56% vs +4.14% for VNQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, VMLUX or VNQ?

VNQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 2.8% for VMLUX. Worst drawdown: VMLUX -8.4% vs VNQ -75.8%.

Should I hold both VMLUX and VNQ?

VMLUX and VNQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between VMLUX and VNQ?

VMLUX and VNQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1059 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, VMLUX or VNQ?

VMLUX yields 2.93% while VNQ yields 3.49%, so VNQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free