VOT vs VV
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
VV has a lower expense ratio. VV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VV offers more diversification with 431 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOT | VV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $19.9B | $52.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.25% | |
| Holdings | 136 | 446 | |
| YTD Return | +9.33% | +13.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.58% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.30% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.56% | +12.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 14.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.3% | -56.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 17, 2006 | Jan 27, 2004 |
VOT vs VV Performance
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VOT returned +8.58% while VV returned +22.17%. Year to date, VOT is up 9.33% versus a gain of 13.23% for VV.
Over three years, VOT compounded at +15.30% per year against +21.70% for VV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.56% and +12.84% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VOT has the edge at +9.62% annualized vs +9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.8% for VV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.3% for VOT and -56.0% for VV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOT charges 0.05% per year while VV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOT currently yields 0.65% against 1.25% for VV.
Holdings Overlap
VOT and VV share 121 holdings out of 431 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOT or VV?
VOT has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VV charges 0.03%. VV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOT or VV?
Over the past year VOT returned +8.58% vs +22.17% for VV, so VV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), VOT annualized +9.62% vs +9.51% for VV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOT or VV?
VOT has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.8% for VV. Worst drawdown: VOT -60.3% vs VV -56.0%.
Should I hold both VOT and VV?
VOT and VV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VOT and VV?
VOT and VV share 121 common holdings with a 8.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 431 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOT or VV?
VOT yields 0.65% while VV yields 1.25%, so VV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.