FFLV vs SBIO
vs
FFLV vs SBIO
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFLV offers more diversification with 115 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | ALPS Advisors |
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.50% |
| AUM | $16M | $197M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 119 | 87 |
| Inception Date | 2024-02-09 | 2014-12-30 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +0.78% | +1.42% |
| YTD Return | +10.21% | +8.15% |
| 1-Year Return | +27.83% | +87.52% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +21.37% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +3.88% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +8.82% |
| Buy Score | 56 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 63 | 59 |
| Value Score | - | 70 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
1
Shared Holdings
200
Total Unique
Top Shared Holdings
| Ticker | FFLV Weight | SBIO Weight |
|---|---|---|
| AZN:LN | 1.05% | 0.00% |
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FFLV or SBIO?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while SBIO charges 0.50%. FFLV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FFLV and SBIO hold the same stocks?
FFLV and SBIO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 200 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FFLV or SBIO?
Over the past year, FFLV returned +27.83% while SBIO returned +87.52%. SBIO outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.