ABI vs VTI

ABI vs VTI

Which is better, ABI or VTI?

VTI has been ahead.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricABIVTI
Expense Ratio0.65%0.03%Best
AUM$56M$666.9B
Dividend Yield5.85%1.03%
Holdings1083,543
YTD Return+2.63%+12.08%Best
1Y Return+3.83%+16.31%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.83%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.89%
Volatility (annualized)1.8%Best11.8%
Max Drawdown-1.1%Best-8.9%
$10,000 over 1.2 years$10,478$12,454Best
Fund FamilyVictory Capital Management Inc.Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Blend
InceptionJun 25, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 30, 2025 to Sep 14, 2026 (1.2 years).

ABI vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.

ABI vs VTI Performance

VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) is an ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABI returned +3.83% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, ABI is up 2.63% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 1.8% for ABI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.1% for ABI and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ABI charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABI currently yields 5.85% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 7 holdings in ABI and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 2.6% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 7 positions we hold weights for in ABI and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 108 and 3,543.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ABI and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ABIVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ABI or VTI?

ABI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ABI or VTI?

Over the past year ABI returned +3.83% vs +16.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ABI annualized +3.97% vs +20.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ABI or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 1.8% for ABI. Worst drawdown: ABI -1.1% vs VTI -8.9%.

Should I hold both ABI and VTI?

ABI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, ABI or VTI?

ABI yields 5.85% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ABI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than ABI?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.