ABNY vs VTI
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABNY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 49.40% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 13 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.55% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.80% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
ABNY vs VTI Performance
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ABNY returned -0.80% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, ABNY is up 2.55% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABNY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.6% for ABNY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABNY charges 1.06% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $3 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABNY currently yields 49.40% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ABNY and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABNY or VTI?
ABNY has an expense ratio of 1.06% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABNY or VTI?
Over the past year ABNY returned -0.80% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ABNY annualized -5.79% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABNY or VTI?
ABNY has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ABNY -31.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ABNY and VTI?
ABNY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABNY and VTI?
ABNY and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABNY or VTI?
ABNY yields 49.40% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ABNY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.