ACES vs VGI
ACES vs VGI
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Virtus Global Multi-Sector Income Fund
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. VGI offers more diversification with 434 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | VGI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 1.74% | |
| AUM | $109M | $88M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 11.98% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 646 | |
| YTD Return | -4.16% | +1.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.72% | +5.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -8.79% | +11.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -13.98% | +2.10% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.4% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.0% | -63.3% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Virtus Investment Partners | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2018 | Feb 23, 2012 |
ACES vs VGI Performance
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Virtus Global Multi-Sector Income Fund (VGI) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past year ACES returned +21.72% while VGI returned +5.12%. Year to date, ACES is down 4.16% versus a gain of 1.47% for VGI.
Over three years, ACES compounded at -8.79% per year against +11.60% for VGI; over five years the annualized figures are -13.98% and +2.10% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, ACES has the edge at +3.76% annualized vs -2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.4% compared with 14.2% for VGI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.0% for ACES and -63.3% for VGI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACES charges 0.55% per year while VGI charges 1.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $174 annually, a gap of $119 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACES currently yields 1.22% against 11.98% for VGI.
Holdings Overlap
ACES and VGI share 0 holdings out of 471 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACES or VGI?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VGI charges 1.74%. ACES is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $119 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACES or VGI?
Over the past year ACES returned +21.72% vs +5.12% for VGI, so ACES leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ACES annualized +3.76% vs -2.38% for VGI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACES or VGI?
ACES has been the more volatile fund at 35.4% annualized versus 14.2% for VGI. Worst drawdown: ACES -79.0% vs VGI -63.3%.
Should I hold both ACES and VGI?
ACES and VGI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACES and VGI?
ACES and VGI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 471 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACES or VGI?
ACES yields 1.22% while VGI yields 11.98%, so VGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.