ACIN vs DMXU
Hartford Alpha Capture International Equity ETF vs Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF
Which is better, ACIN or DMXU?
ACIN has been ahead.
DMXU has a lower expense ratio. ACIN led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIN | DMXU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $558M | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.91% |
| Holdings | 421 | 1,292 |
| YTD Return | +1.44% | +5.96%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +9.07% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.68% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.97% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Xtrackers ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2008 | Sep 5, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACIN vs DMXU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACIN vs DMXU Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture International Equity ETF (ACIN) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF (DMXU) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs. Year to date, ACIN is up 1.44% versus a gain of 5.96% for DMXU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIN charges 0.52% per year while DMXU charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $3 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIN currently yields 0.00% against 3.91% for DMXU.
Holdings Overlap
At least 43.2% of DMXU's money is in holdings ACIN also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ACIN, our book for it covers 87.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
165 positions in common, counted across the 409 positions we hold weights for in ACIN and 629 in DMXU, against full books of 421 and 1,292.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIN | Weight in DMXU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding N.V. | 2.09% | 2.31% | 0.22% |
| SCHN:PASchneider Electric Se | 1.47% | 0.57% | 0.90% |
| SHEL:LNShell plc | 0.85% | 1.18% | 0.33% |
| AZN:LNAstrazeneca Plc | 0.85% | 1.08% | 0.23% |
| UBSG:SMUbs Group Ag Ordinary Shares | 1.15% | 0.52% | 0.63% |
| 6857:JPAdvantest Corp | 0.98% | 0.60% | 0.38% |
| RY:CARoyal Bank of Canada | 0.49% | 1.03% | 0.54% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 0.32% | 1.17% | 0.85% |
| UCG:MIUnicredit Spa | 0.96% | 0.48% | 0.48% |
| 6861:JPKeyence Corp | 1.04% | 0.37% | 0.67% |
43.2% of DMXU is already inside ACIN.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIN or DMXU?
ACIN has an expense ratio of 0.52% while DMXU charges 0.03%. DMXU is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIN and DMXU?
At least 43.2% of DMXU's money is in holdings ACIN also owns. Our book for ACIN is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 165 positions in common, counted across the 409 positions we hold weights for in ACIN and 629 in DMXU.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIN or DMXU?
ACIN yields 0.00% while DMXU yields 3.91%, so DMXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DMXU better than ACIN?
DMXU has a lower expense ratio. ACIN led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.