ACIN vs EFA
Hartford Alpha Capture International Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Which is better, ACIN or EFA?
ACIN has been ahead.
EFA has a lower expense ratio. ACIN led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIN | EFA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.32%Best |
| AUM | $558M | $77.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.23% |
| Holdings | 421 | 1,365 |
| YTD Return | +1.44% | +9.05%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +12.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.47% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2008 | Aug 14, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACIN vs EFA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACIN vs EFA Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture International Equity ETF (ACIN) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACIN is up 1.44% versus a gain of 9.05% for EFA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIN charges 0.52% per year while EFA charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $32 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIN currently yields 0.00% against 3.23% for EFA.
Holdings Overlap
At least 46.9% of EFA's money is in holdings ACIN also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ACIN, our book for it covers 87.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
162 positions in common, counted across the 409 positions we hold weights for in ACIN and 656 in EFA, against full books of 421 and 1,365.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIN | Weight in EFA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding N.V. | 2.09% | 2.86% | 0.77% |
| SHEL:LNShell plc | 0.85% | 1.46% | 0.61% |
| AZN:LNAstrazeneca Plc | 0.85% | 1.32% | 0.47% |
| UBSG:SMUbs Group Ag Ordinary Shares | 1.15% | 0.69% | 0.46% |
| 6857:JPAdvantest Corp | 0.98% | 0.76% | 0.22% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 0.32% | 1.39% | 1.07% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 0.38% | 1.24% | 0.86% |
| SAP:SGSap Se | 0.39% | 1.11% | 0.72% |
| 6861:JPKeyence Corp | 1.04% | 0.44% | 0.60% |
| UCG:MIUnicredit Spa | 0.96% | 0.52% | 0.44% |
46.9% of EFA is already inside ACIN.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIN or EFA?
ACIN has an expense ratio of 0.52% while EFA charges 0.32%. EFA is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIN and EFA?
At least 46.9% of EFA's money is in holdings ACIN also owns. Our book for ACIN is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 162 positions in common, counted across the 409 positions we hold weights for in ACIN and 656 in EFA.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIN or EFA?
ACIN yields 0.00% while EFA yields 3.23%, so EFA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is EFA better than ACIN?
EFA has a lower expense ratio. ACIN led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.