ACIN vs EFAA
Hartford Alpha Capture International Equity ETF vs Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF
Which is better, ACIN or EFAA?
ACIN has been ahead.
EFAA has a lower expense ratio. ACIN led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIN | EFAA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $558M | $677M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 8.47% |
| Holdings | 421 | 1,376 |
| YTD Return | +1.44% | +7.58%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +10.68% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2008 | Jul 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACIN vs EFAA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACIN vs EFAA Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture International Equity ETF (ACIN) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, ACIN is up 1.44% versus a gain of 7.58% for EFAA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIN charges 0.52% per year while EFAA charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $39 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIN currently yields 0.00% against 8.47% for EFAA.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 409 holdings in ACIN and 641 in EFAA, totalling 87.0% and 73.8% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 166 positions appear in both.
166 positions in common, counted across the 409 positions we hold weights for in ACIN and 641 in EFAA, against full books of 421 and 1,376.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIN | Weight in EFAA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding N.V. | 2.09% | 2.09% | 0.00% |
| SCHN:PASchneider Electric Se | 1.47% | 0.52% | 0.95% |
| AZN:LNAstrazeneca Plc | 0.85% | 1.00% | 0.15% |
| 6857:JPAdvantest Corp | 0.98% | 0.48% | 0.50% |
| UCG:MIUnicredit Spa | 0.96% | 0.45% | 0.51% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 0.32% | 1.06% | 0.74% |
| 6861:JPKeyence Corp | 1.04% | 0.32% | 0.72% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 0.38% | 0.96% | 0.58% |
| RR:LNRolls-Royce Holdings Plc | 0.71% | 0.53% | 0.18% |
| SAP:SGSap Se | 0.39% | 0.84% | 0.45% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACIN and EFAA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIN or EFAA?
ACIN has an expense ratio of 0.52% while EFAA charges 0.39%. EFAA is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIN or EFAA?
ACIN yields 0.00% while EFAA yields 8.47%, so EFAA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is EFAA better than ACIN?
EFAA has a lower expense ratio. ACIN led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.