ACIN vs PJIN
Hartford Alpha Capture International Equity ETF vs PGIM Jennison International Core Equity ETF
Which is better, ACIN or PJIN?
PJIN costs less.
PJIN has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIN | PJIN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.23%Best |
| AUM | $558M | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 421 | 340 |
| YTD Return | +1.44%Best | -3.65% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2008 | Sep 1, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACIN vs PJIN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACIN vs PJIN Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture International Equity ETF (ACIN) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and PGIM Jennison International Core Equity ETF (PJIN) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Year to date, ACIN is up 1.44% versus a loss of 3.65% for PJIN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIN charges 0.52% per year while PJIN charges 0.23%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $23 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PJIN.
Holdings Overlap
At least 41.5% of PJIN's money is in holdings ACIN also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ACIN, our book for it covers 87.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
46 positions in common, counted across the 409 positions we hold weights for in ACIN and 110 in PJIN, against full books of 421 and 340.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIN | Weight in PJIN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTE:PATotal Energies Se | 0.54% | 2.64% | 2.10% |
| AXAF:PAAxa Sa | 0.21% | 2.78% | 2.57% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 0.38% | 2.53% | 2.15% |
| ITX:MAIndustria De Diseno Textil Sa | 0.71% | 1.83% | 1.12% |
| AZN:LNAstrazeneca Plc | 0.85% | 1.58% | 0.73% |
| SCHN:PASchneider Electric Se | 1.47% | 0.72% | 0.75% |
| CPG:LNCompass Group Plc | 0.16% | 1.93% | 1.77% |
| UBSG:SMUbs Group Ag Ordinary Shares | 1.15% | 0.89% | 0.26% |
| UCG:MIUnicredit Spa | 0.96% | 0.98% | 0.02% |
| CNI:AUCenturia Capital Group | 0.35% | 1.53% | 1.18% |
41.5% of PJIN is already inside ACIN.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIN or PJIN?
ACIN has an expense ratio of 0.52% while PJIN charges 0.23%. PJIN is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIN and PJIN?
At least 41.5% of PJIN's money is in holdings ACIN also owns. Our book for ACIN is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 46 positions in common, counted across the 409 positions we hold weights for in ACIN and 110 in PJIN.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIN or PJIN?
ACIN yields 0.00% while PJIN yields 0.00%, so PJIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJIN better than ACIN?
PJIN has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.