ACIO vs FDAT
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs Tactical Advantage ETF
Which is better, ACIO or FDAT?
ACIO has been ahead.
ACIO has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIO | FDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.16% |
| AUM | $2.4B | $36M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 5.94% |
| Holdings | 524 | 9 |
| YTD Return | +8.01%Best | +2.79% |
| 1Y Return | +8.79%Best | +2.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.63%Best | +9.28% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.4% | 8.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1% | -8.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $15,877Best | $13,015 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8% | - |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Tactical Advantage |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2019 | Apr 11, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.5 years).
ACIO vs FDAT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
ACIO vs FDAT Performance
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) is an ETF from Tactical Advantage. Over the past year ACIO returned +8.79% while FDAT returned +2.00%. Year to date, ACIO is up 8.01% versus a gain of 2.79% for FDAT.
Over three years, ACIO compounded at +15.63% per year against +9.28% for FDAT. Across the full 4-year window we track, ACIO has the edge at +14.12% annualized vs +7.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACIO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.4% compared with 8.6% for FDAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for ACIO and -8.2% for FDAT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIO charges 0.79% per year while FDAT charges 1.16%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $116 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.39% against 5.94% for FDAT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 167 holdings in ACIO and 8 in FDAT, totalling 99.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 8 in FDAT, against full books of 524 and 9.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for FDAT that do not appear in our book for ACIO (100.0% of the fund), and 166 for ACIO that do not appear in FDAT (99.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACIO and FDAT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIO or FDAT?
ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while FDAT charges 1.16%. ACIO is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACIO or FDAT?
Over the past year ACIO returned +8.79% vs +2.00% for FDAT, so ACIO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ACIO annualized +14.12% vs +7.82% for FDAT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACIO or FDAT?
ACIO has been the more volatile fund at 9.4% annualized versus 8.6% for FDAT. Worst drawdown: ACIO -12.1% vs FDAT -8.2%.
Should I hold both ACIO and FDAT?
ACIO and FDAT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or FDAT?
ACIO yields 0.39% while FDAT yields 5.94%, so FDAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDAT better than ACIO?
ACIO has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.