ACQQ vs VTI
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ACQQ or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACQQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 1 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -5.00% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.41% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 13, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACQQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACQQ vs VTI Performance
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF (ACQQ) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ACQQ is down 5.00% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACQQ charges 0.72% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACQQ currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in ACQQ and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 69.3% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in ACQQ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACQQ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACQQ or VTI?
ACQQ has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACQQ or VTI?
ACQQ yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ACQQ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.