ADFI vs IVV
Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADFI | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $50M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.22% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -1.39% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.21% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.66% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.61% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Regents Park Funds, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
ADFI vs IVV Performance
Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) is a ETF from Regents Park Funds, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ADFI returned +1.21% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, ADFI is down 1.39% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, ADFI compounded at +2.66% per year against +21.55% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.61% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs -0.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.4% for ADFI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.0% for ADFI and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADFI charges 1.68% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $168 vs $3 annually, a gap of $165 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADFI currently yields 3.22% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ADFI and IVV share 0 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADFI or IVV?
ADFI has an expense ratio of 1.68% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $165 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ADFI or IVV?
Over the past year ADFI returned +1.21% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ADFI annualized -0.89% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ADFI or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.4% for ADFI. Worst drawdown: ADFI -18.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ADFI and IVV?
ADFI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ADFI and IVV?
ADFI and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADFI or IVV?
ADFI yields 3.22% while IVV yields 1.09%, so ADFI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.