AGOX vs VTI
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGOX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.33% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $393M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.79% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 113 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.01% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.03% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.51% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.00% | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Adaptive ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
AGOX vs VTI Performance
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) is a ETF from Adaptive ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGOX returned +18.03% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, AGOX is up 17.01% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Over three years, AGOX compounded at +14.51% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.00% and +11.84% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, AGOX has the edge at +8.17% annualized vs +8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGOX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.9% for AGOX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGOX charges 1.33% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $133 vs $3 annually, a gap of $130 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGOX currently yields 2.79% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGOX or VTI?
AGOX has an expense ratio of 1.33% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $130 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGOX or VTI?
Over the past year AGOX returned +18.03% vs +20.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), AGOX annualized +8.17% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGOX or VTI?
AGOX has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AGOX -26.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AGOX and VTI?
AGOX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between AGOX and VTI?
AGOX and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2811 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGOX or VTI?
AGOX yields 2.79% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AGOX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.