AGQ vs VTI
ProShares Ultra Silver vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AGQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGQ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -44.31% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +74.17% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +48.20% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.69% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 65.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -98.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
AGQ vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGQ returned +74.17% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, AGQ is down 44.31% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, AGQ compounded at +48.20% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +19.69% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 65.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -98.2% for AGQ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGQ charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGQ currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AGQ and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGQ or VTI?
AGQ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGQ or VTI?
Over the past year AGQ returned +74.17% vs +22.35% for VTI, so AGQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), AGQ annualized +3.95% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGQ or VTI?
AGQ has been the more volatile fund at 65.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AGQ -98.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AGQ and VTI?
AGQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGQ and VTI?
AGQ and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGQ or VTI?
AGQ yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.