AGQ vs VOO
ProShares Ultra Silver vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AGQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGQ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -53.14% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +46.59% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +40.43% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.88% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 65.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -98.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2008 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AGQ vs VOO Performance
ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGQ returned +46.59% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, AGQ is down 53.14% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, AGQ compounded at +40.43% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +15.88% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.50% annualized vs +2.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 65.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -98.2% for AGQ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGQ charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGQ currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AGQ and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGQ or VOO?
AGQ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGQ or VOO?
Over the past year AGQ returned +46.59% vs +20.69% for VOO, so AGQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), AGQ annualized +2.94% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGQ or VOO?
AGQ has been the more volatile fund at 65.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AGQ -98.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AGQ and VOO?
AGQ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGQ and VOO?
AGQ and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGQ or VOO?
AGQ yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.