AIMS vs IVV
Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AIMS or IVV?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AIMS is less concentrated, with 13.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIMS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $87M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 284 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +8.75% | +11.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Top 10 Weight | 13.7%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Acuitas Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 10, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AIMS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AIMS vs IVV Performance
Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) is an ETF from Acuitas Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, AIMS is up 8.75% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIMS charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIMS currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of AIMS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 279 positions we hold weights for in AIMS and 505 in IVV, against full books of 284 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AIMS (99.3% of the fund), and 269 for AIMS that do not appear in IVV (97.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIMS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AREAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc. | 0.11% | 0.01% | 0.10% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AIMS and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIMS or IVV?
AIMS has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIMS or IVV?
AIMS yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AIMS?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AIMS is less concentrated, with 13.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.