ALLW vs VTI
State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ALLW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.40% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.89% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.12% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
ALLW vs VTI Performance
State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ALLW returned +18.12% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, ALLW is up 7.89% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 9.0% for ALLW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.8% for ALLW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ALLW charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ALLW currently yields 4.40% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ALLW and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2806 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ALLW or VTI?
ALLW has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ALLW or VTI?
Over the past year ALLW returned +18.12% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ALLW annualized +16.84% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ALLW or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 9.0% for ALLW. Worst drawdown: ALLW -8.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ALLW and VTI?
ALLW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ALLW and VTI?
ALLW and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2806 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ALLW or VTI?
ALLW yields 4.40% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ALLW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.