AMA vs QQQ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, AMA or QQQ?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $27M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 8 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -0.65% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
AMA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AMA vs QQQ Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF (AMA) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, AMA is down 0.65% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMA charges 1.29% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $18 annually, a gap of $111 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMA currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in AMA and 102 in QQQ, totalling 6.3% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in AMA and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 8 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMA and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMA or QQQ?
AMA has an expense ratio of 1.29% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $111 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMA or QQQ?
AMA yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than AMA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.