AMID vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAMIDVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.52%0.04%
AUM$111M$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.33%2.86%
Holdings46568
YTD Return+9.96%+16.16%
1Y Return+12.12%+26.05%
3Y Return (annualized)+11.30%+18.43%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.21%
Volatility (annualized)18.0%14.6%
Max Drawdown-23.1%-58.8%
Fund FamilyAlpha ArchitectVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionAug 17, 2022Nov 10, 2006

AMID vs VYM Performance

Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) is a ETF from Alpha Architect and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMID returned +12.12% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, AMID is up 9.96% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.

Over three years, AMID compounded at +11.30% per year against +18.43% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, AMID has the edge at +11.26% annualized vs +7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AMID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.1% for AMID and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AMID charges 0.52% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $4 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMID currently yields 0.33% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

0.5%overlap

AMID and VYM share 7 holdings out of 597 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AMIDWeight in VYMDifference
VCTR4.52%0.01%4.51%
HPE2.79%0.12%2.67%
HLI2.48%0.04%2.44%
EWBCProProPro
IFFProProPro
CHRWProProPro
OASProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 7 holdings AMID shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AMID or VYM?

AMID has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AMID or VYM?

Over the past year AMID returned +12.12% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AMID annualized +11.26% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AMID or VYM?

AMID has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: AMID -23.1% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both AMID and VYM?

AMID and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between AMID and VYM?

AMID and VYM share 7 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 597 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AMID or VYM?

AMID yields 0.33% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.