AMUN vs VOO
abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AMUN or VOO?
Short Term Municipal Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMUN | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $55M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.37% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 64 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +1.89% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.06% | +17.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term Municipal Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 17, 1986 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
AMUN vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AMUN vs VOO Performance
abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMUN returned +2.06% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, AMUN is up 1.89% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMUN charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMUN currently yields 2.37% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 16 holdings in AMUN and 494 in VOO, totalling 24.5% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 16 positions we hold weights for in AMUN and 494 in VOO, against full books of 64 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMUN and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMUN or VOO?
AMUN has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMUN or VOO?
Over the past year AMUN returned +2.06% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMUN or VOO?
AMUN yields 2.37% while VOO yields 1.04%, so AMUN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than AMUN?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.