AMZW vs VYM
Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $37M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 48.19% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +2.49% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.90% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
AMZW vs VYM Performance
Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMZW returned -1.90% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, AMZW is up 2.49% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.0% for AMZW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZW charges 1.00% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $4 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZW currently yields 48.19% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
AMZW and VYM share 0 holdings out of 605 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZW or VYM?
AMZW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMZW or VYM?
Over the past year AMZW returned -1.90% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AMZW annualized +7.54% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMZW or VYM?
AMZW has been the more volatile fund at 42.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: AMZW -28.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both AMZW and VYM?
AMZW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMZW and VYM?
AMZW and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 605 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZW or VYM?
AMZW yields 48.19% while VYM yields 2.24%, so AMZW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.