AMZW vs VXUS
Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZW | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $32M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 48.60% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.62% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.62% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
AMZW vs VXUS Performance
Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMZW returned +2.62% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, AMZW is up 3.62% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.0% for AMZW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.18. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZW charges 0.99% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $5 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZW currently yields 48.60% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
AMZW and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7863 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZW or VXUS?
AMZW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMZW or VXUS?
Over the past year AMZW returned +2.62% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AMZW annualized +8.59% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMZW or VXUS?
AMZW has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: AMZW -28.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both AMZW and VXUS?
AMZW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.18, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMZW and VXUS?
AMZW and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7863 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZW or VXUS?
AMZW yields 48.60% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so AMZW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.