AMZZ vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $42M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.66% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.25% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 63.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
AMZZ vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMZZ returned +12.25% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, AMZZ is up 14.66% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 63.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.3% for AMZZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZZ charges 1.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AMZZ and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMZZ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | 66.67% | 3.17% | 63.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZZ or VTI?
AMZZ has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMZZ or VTI?
Over the past year AMZZ returned +12.25% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AMZZ annualized +14.54% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMZZ or VTI?
AMZZ has been the more volatile fund at 63.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMZZ -55.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AMZZ and VTI?
AMZZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMZZ and VTI?
AMZZ and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 3.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZZ or VTI?
AMZZ yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.