ANGL vs VTI
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANGL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.1B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.49% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 132 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.66% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.23% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.63% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.22% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 10, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
ANGL vs VTI Performance
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ANGL returned +6.23% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, ANGL is up 2.66% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, ANGL compounded at +8.63% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.22% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +3.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 8.5% for ANGL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.6% for ANGL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANGL charges 0.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANGL currently yields 6.49% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ANGL and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2909 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANGL or VTI?
ANGL has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ANGL or VTI?
Over the past year ANGL returned +6.23% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), ANGL annualized +3.21% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ANGL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 8.5% for ANGL. Worst drawdown: ANGL -29.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ANGL and VTI?
ANGL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ANGL and VTI?
ANGL and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2909 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANGL or VTI?
ANGL yields 6.49% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ANGL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.