ANGL vs VTI
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ANGL or VTI?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANGL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.2B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.49% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 129 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.37% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.64% | +20.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.36% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.93% | +11.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.5%Best | 14.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.6%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,553 | $17,474Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 10, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 11, 2012 to Sep 4, 2026 (14.4 years).
ANGL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.4 years both funds cover.
ANGL vs VTI Performance
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ANGL returned +4.64% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, ANGL is up 2.37% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, ANGL compounded at +8.36% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.93% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.04% annualized vs +3.18%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 8.5% for ANGL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.6% for ANGL and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANGL charges 0.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANGL currently yields 6.49% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 122 holdings in ANGL and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 94.2% and 92.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 122 positions we hold weights for in ANGL and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 129 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ANGL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANGL or VTI?
ANGL has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ANGL or VTI?
Over the past year ANGL returned +4.64% vs +20.00% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), ANGL annualized +3.18% vs +13.04% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ANGL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 8.5% for ANGL. Worst drawdown: ANGL -29.6% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both ANGL and VTI?
ANGL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANGL or VTI?
ANGL yields 6.49% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ANGL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ANGL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.