ANGL vs VYM
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANGL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $3.1B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.32% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 132 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +2.03% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.68% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.33% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.15% | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 10, 2012 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ANGL vs VYM Performance
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ANGL returned +5.68% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, ANGL is up 2.03% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Over three years, ANGL compounded at +8.33% per year against +18.54% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +3.15% and +12.25% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs +3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 8.5% for ANGL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.6% for ANGL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANGL charges 0.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $4 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANGL currently yields 6.32% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANGL or VYM?
ANGL has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ANGL or VYM?
Over the past year ANGL returned +5.68% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), ANGL annualized +3.17% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ANGL or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 8.5% for ANGL. Worst drawdown: ANGL -29.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ANGL and VYM?
ANGL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ANGL and VYM?
ANGL and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 677 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANGL or VYM?
ANGL yields 6.32% while VYM yields 2.86%, so ANGL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.