AOM vs SPY
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, AOM or SPY?
Debt-oriented balanced against Large Cap Blend.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOM | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $804.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.05% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 9 | 505 |
| YTD Return | +5.16% | +13.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.52% | +16.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.46% | +22.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.71% | +13.73%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.2%Best | 14.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0%Best | -34.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,588 | $19,027Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Debt-oriented balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2008 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 11, 2008 to Sep 21, 2026 (17.9 years).
AOM vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.9 years both funds cover.
AOM vs SPY Performance
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year AOM returned +7.52% while SPY returned +16.96%. Year to date, AOM is up 5.16% versus a gain of 13.82% for SPY.
Over three years, AOM compounded at +11.46% per year against +22.97% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +4.71% and +13.73% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +13.29% annualized vs +5.04%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 7.2% for AOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for AOM and -34.1% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOM charges 0.15% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $9 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOM currently yields 3.05% against 0.98% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 8 holdings in AOM and 504 in SPY, totalling 99.8% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 8 positions we hold weights for in AOM and 504 in SPY, against full books of 9 and 505.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 497 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for AOM (99.3% of the fund), and 8 for AOM that do not appear in SPY (99.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AOM and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOM or SPY?
AOM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOM or SPY?
Over the past year AOM returned +7.52% vs +16.96% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), AOM annualized +5.04% vs +13.29% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOM or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 7.2% for AOM. Worst drawdown: AOM -20.0% vs SPY -34.1%.
Should I hold both AOM and SPY?
AOM and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOM or SPY?
AOM yields 3.05% while SPY yields 0.98%, so AOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than AOM?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.