APRH vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAPRHVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%
AUM$25M$663.5B
Dividend Yield3.82%1.07%
Holdings83,543
YTD Return+2.08%+14.96%
1Y Return+0.87%+22.39%
3Y Return (annualized)+5.13%+21.51%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Volatility (annualized)3.0%15.4%
Max Drawdown-5.9%-56.6%
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionApr 3, 2023May 24, 2001

APRH vs VTI Performance

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year APRH returned +0.87% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, APRH is up 2.08% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.

Over three years, APRH compounded at +5.13% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 3.0% for APRH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.9% for APRH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

APRH charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APRH currently yields 3.82% against 1.07% for VTI.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, APRH or VTI?

APRH has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.

Which performed better, APRH or VTI?

Over the past year APRH returned +0.87% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), APRH annualized +5.77% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, APRH or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 3.0% for APRH. Worst drawdown: APRH -5.9% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both APRH and VTI?

APRH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

Which pays a higher dividend, APRH or VTI?

APRH yields 3.82% while VTI yields 1.07%, so APRH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.