APRH vs VOO

APRH vs VOO

Which is better, APRH or VOO?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAPRHVOO
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%Best
AUM$25M$997.4B
Dividend Yield5.85%1.04%
Holdings16509
YTD Return+2.20%+12.37%Best
1Y Return+0.34%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+4.91%+21.37%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.49%
Volatility (annualized)3.0%Best12.6%
Max Drawdown-5.9%Best-18.7%
$10,000 over 3.5 years$12,117$19,555Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 3, 2023Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 3, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.5 years).

APRH vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.

APRH vs VOO Performance

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year APRH returned +0.34% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, APRH is up 2.20% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Over three years, APRH compounded at +4.91% per year against +21.37% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +21.12% annualized vs +5.64%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 3.0% for APRH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.9% for APRH and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

APRH charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APRH currently yields 5.85% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of APRH and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

APRHVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, APRH or VOO?

APRH has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, APRH or VOO?

Over the past year APRH returned +0.34% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), APRH annualized +5.64% vs +21.12% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, APRH or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 3.0% for APRH. Worst drawdown: APRH -5.9% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both APRH and VOO?

APRH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, APRH or VOO?

APRH yields 5.85% while VOO yields 1.04%, so APRH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than APRH?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.