APRZ vs VTI
Trueshares Structured Outcome (April) ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | APRZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $34M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.15% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 13 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.45% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.33% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.78% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
APRZ vs VTI Performance
Trueshares Structured Outcome (April) ETF (APRZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year APRZ returned +11.33% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, APRZ is up 8.45% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, APRZ compounded at +14.54% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.78% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, APRZ has the edge at +10.63% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.5% for APRZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.1% for APRZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
APRZ charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APRZ currently yields 3.15% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
APRZ and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, APRZ or VTI?
APRZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, APRZ or VTI?
Over the past year APRZ returned +11.33% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), APRZ annualized +10.63% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, APRZ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.5% for APRZ. Worst drawdown: APRZ -18.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both APRZ and VTI?
APRZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between APRZ and VTI?
APRZ and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, APRZ or VTI?
APRZ yields 3.15% while VTI yields 1.07%, so APRZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.