ARGT vs VTI
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARGT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $846M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.36% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.96% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.00% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.89% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 2, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
ARGT vs VTI Performance
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ARGT returned +6.96% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, ARGT is up 0.36% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, ARGT compounded at +28.00% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +23.89% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.2% for ARGT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARGT charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARGT currently yields 1.12% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ARGT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2808 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARGT or VTI?
ARGT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARGT or VTI?
Over the past year ARGT returned +6.96% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), ARGT annualized +3.20% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARGT or VTI?
ARGT has been the more volatile fund at 33.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ARGT -77.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ARGT and VTI?
ARGT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARGT and VTI?
ARGT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2808 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARGT or VTI?
ARGT yields 1.12% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ARGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.