ARGT vs VTI
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ARGT or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ARGT led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARGT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $722M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 57 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -7.12% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +26.26%Best | +15.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.30%Best | +22.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.41%Best | +12.31% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.8% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -77.2% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $27,484Best | $17,869 |
| Top 10 Weight | 69.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 2, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 3, 2011 to Oct 1, 2026 (15.6 years).
ARGT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.6 years both funds cover.
ARGT vs VTI Performance
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ARGT returned +26.26% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, ARGT is down 7.12% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Over three years, ARGT compounded at +29.30% per year against +22.50% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +22.41% and +12.31% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.06% annualized vs +2.66%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.8% compared with 14.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.2% for ARGT and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARGT charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARGT currently yields 1.09% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 25 holdings in ARGT and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 100.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, ARGT as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in ARGT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 57 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ARGT (97.5% of the fund), and 14 for ARGT that do not appear in VTI (52.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARGT and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARGT or VTI?
ARGT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARGT or VTI?
Over the past year ARGT returned +26.26% vs +15.23% for VTI, so ARGT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ARGT annualized +2.66% vs +12.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARGT or VTI?
ARGT has been the more volatile fund at 33.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ARGT -77.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both ARGT and VTI?
ARGT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARGT or VTI?
ARGT yields 1.09% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ARGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ARGT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ARGT led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.